Considering life, time is a unit of measurement since all events 
occur within its intervals. In fact, no two recurrent activities in 
history can be absolutely described without due reference to it. For 
instance, when intercontinental events such as the Olympics, Fédération 
Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) world cup and Wimbledon 
are occur repeatedly in the same location, they are mainly referenced 
based on their years or dates of occurrence. Again, time is generally an
 independent resource which we spend and can never retrieve –we can only
 attempt to compensate for it presently or in future. Therefore, in 
achieving project objectives and producing deliverables, time is a 
critical constraint to which all human resource must be sensitive.
When customers, sponsors and other stakeholders outside an active 
project team appraise the team or their projects highly, they often 
adjudge them based on the team’s ability to maximally influence the main
 constraints of time, cost, scope and quality. This suggests that a 
team’s collective ability to produce the totality of expected 
deliverables in a satisfactory manner at a friendly budget within the 
appropriate schedule is what qualifies them as an ace project team; not 
the presence of a few highly-skilled or vastly-experienced individuals. 
While it is true that the presence of an effective project manager makes
 a team prone to being more successful, most successful teams are 
actually constituted by members who each understand the overall effect 
of working in proximity to planned schedule. If a team of fourteen 
members contain seven persons that are variously certified by PMI as 
CAPM®, PMP® and PMI-RMP® credential holders and these individuals apply 
and transfer the knowledge obtained from the consulted editions of the 
Guide to Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) across the 
entire team, the likelihood of the team’s overall success will escalate 
as the factor of time will be handled more efficiently.
Dynamic project managers and team leads adequately imbibe the 
schedule management tools and techniques recognized in the PMBOK® Guide 
and consciously influence their subordinates to do likewise. Great team 
members are persons who always desire to keep the disparity between 
planned project time and the actual work durations minimal. They 
demonstrate a working knowledge of the flow of work. They understand how
 the duration of each preceding activity affects its successor and can 
proactively predict their resulting effects on the overall project 
length. However, this does not overrule the ultimate responsibility 
incumbent on project managers to verify the appropriate completion of 
work packages. Rather, it fosters the probability of keeping the time 
expended in actualizing the deliverables at relative parity with the 
pre-planned durations and schedule baseline...
To read on, please visit: Project Times where it was first published.
 

 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Send us your comments.