Governance cannot work without proper management because the
functions performed in governance are a subset of what managers do in
business. Upon comparing a governor, as a typical prime government
player, to a manager, who is the first chief entrepreneur in a business
environment, it is seen that a governor is actually a manager who based,
on the overall leadership style, may or may not have advisers. Both
governors and managers perform the functions of planning, coordinating
or controlling, organizing and leading- though at different levels and
qualities.
They administer resources, delegate responsibilities, possess the
powers to punish or reward, and should be accountable for budget
implementation and state expenditures. They occupy hierarchical
positions where several other persons who directly perform the
documented and planned tasks report to them on a consistent
basis. As such, both governors and managers coordinate the resources
entrusted to them, distribute them as planned and monitor the work done
with or by the resources that in the end, they may have good accounts of
the entire assignments from the planning stages to closing stages, if
it is presumed that they both have to report to the public electors and
senior managers respectively. Ultimately, no governor or manager can be
so called in the absence of manpower, machinery, materials, money and
any other useful resource. Governance is serious management business and
not some sort of formal entertainment.
But while both are administrators, they are not equal and cannot be
the same. The active leadership style and approved laws of each nation
determine their differences. For instance, democratic countries provide
the pre-requisite qualifications for persons who may aspire for the
office of state governor as electoral candidates and these are stated in
their national constitutions. Once such persons satisfy the initial
conditions provided in the constitution, it is assumed that they are
competent and should be voted for even if they lack good managerial
qualities. As such, while a manager can be relieved of power within the
provisions of applicable contract terms by the same senior managers or
stakeholders who conferred such authorities upon him/her, a governor
cannot be dismissed by the exact persons who elected him/her into
office. Rather, a governor will only relinquish power when his fellow
government players approved in the constitution, whether judicial or
legislative, see reasons to effect his/her impeachment...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Send us your comments.